The ATF’s attempt to classifying pistols with braces as SBRs (short barreled rifles) was shot down in court ( Mock v. Garland) recently, marking a significant victory for Second Amendment advocates. The pistol brace ban shot down by the fifth circuit court of appeals was influenced by the 2022 Bruen decision, where it was ruled that and regulations pertaining to firearms must be in line with our historical understanding of the Second Amendment. Judge Smith wrote for the majority and noted that the pistol brace rule lacked historical precedent and placed burdens on law-abiding citizens by reclassifying legally owned firearms and illegals under the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Implications

The pistol brace ban shot down by the fifth circuit court of appeals has implications for future gun legislation. Future gun laws must have roots in historical context in order to be justified. The Second Amendment does not allow for the overreach of any organization, especially the ATF. The precedents set in this ruling, as well as the Bruen decision will help preserve critical concepts that are vital to the Second Amendment. The ATF will most likely appeal this decision, so the fight is far from over. Make sure that you stay informed and engaged so you can be compliant with the law and so your voice can be heard.

Training

What are you doing to make meaningful improvements to your skill set? Have you been thinking about taking a gun class or pursuing your License to Carry (LTC)? Trigger Maestro has both in person and online classes that are great for you. Ask about our NRA Basic Pistol Class (email: dane@triggermaestro.com) or enroll in our simple and self paced online LTC class.